
By default, qualitative analysis often means presenting common themes and supporting them with representative quotes from participants.
This is a great starting point, but typically fails to capture the true complexity of the data. More importantly, this simplistic strategy can provide weak support for your argument.
Pat Bazeley, a qualitative and mixed methods data analysis expert in Australia, believes we can do much better.
In her paper “Analysing Qualitative Data: More Than ‘Identifying Themes’‘” Bazeley suggests using theme analysis as a starting point for more complete modeling and theory building.
To begin, says Bazeley, we should “describe, compare, and relate” our data. This means outlining the characteristics of the data, then describing how people are addressing certain themes. Who is talking about this? Who isn’t? Read more »


